On Ethnic Slurs and White Privilege

poles

White Americans, at least in the Northeast, like to hyphenate themselves. There are German Americans, Irish Americans, Italian Americans, and every other variety of American not descended from the British Isles. Asking someone his ethnicity isn’t a “micro aggression.” It’s a form of salutation.

Rogouski? What kind of name is that? Russian?

Polish, but they mangled it at Ellis Island so I have no idea what the original was.

Having a very identifiably Polish American name also means I’m no stranger to ethnic slurs. I’m often a little surprised at how little hesitation even my friends feel about telling Polish jokes. I suppose it’s because there’s little or on discrimination against Polish Americans in the United States. Homeland Security isn’t going to put a tap on my phone to determine whether or not I’m ordering too much kielbasa from Pulaski’s Meats. The NYPD is no more likely to stop and frisk someone with an “ski” at than they are someone who can trace his ancestor back to the Mayflower. Security guards don’t follow me though expensive department stores because they’re afraid I’m going to shoplift an expensive article of clothing. I actually do all my shoplifting at Walmart, but that’s another story. In the age of Donald Trump, the name “Rogouski” might even make it easier for me to get a job or an apartment, since it very obviously means I’m not black or Latino.

It’s different in the United Kingdom. After Hillary Clinton’s friends subjected Poland to a harsh program of “shock treatment” in the 1990s, and destroyed its economic safety net, the country was admitted to the European Union in 2004. That allowed the newly minted Polish oligarchy to export its unemployment problem to Western Europe, a good deal for the British ruling class, since it meant over half a million cheap Polish laborers could come to the United Kingdom. It was a bad deal, however, for British workers, who either wouldn’t, or couldn’t work as cheaply as the typical migrant from Eastern Europe. Xenophobic organization like UKIP and Britain First have exploited the neoliberal turn of the British Labor Party to gain votes by scapegoating Poles and other foreigner workers. If I moved to the United Kingdom, I suspect that in addition to having to spell out my name, it might get me a few dirty looks, at least until I revealed myself as a native English speaker.

So why am I going on about anti-Polish bigotry in the United Kingdom?

For the past few days, Yahoo has been feeding a story into my news feed about a 16-year old Polish girl named Dagmara Przybysz, who committed suicide at her school in Cornwall, supposedly because she was the victim of the kind of racism illustrated by the tweet I inserted above. There’s only a very tenuous connection between what happened to her and anti-Polish bigotry – she complained about “racism” online a few years ago – and I suspect that her death had more to do with clinical depression than ethnic bigotry. People have pointed out pointed out that Dagmara Przybysz suffered from xenophobia, not racism. Poles and British people are more or less the same color. What they missed, however, is how ethnic slurs work. Anti-Polish ethnic slurs might not be “racist,” but they are a challenge, a test. It’s a bit like calling someone a fag. If you respond to that kind of disrespect by ignoring it or by laughing it off, you’ll be considered a weakling and subjected to even more ethnic slurs. If someone calls you a dumb Pollack and you punch him in the mouth, it will probably be the last time he calls you a dumb Pollack.

High schools in the United Kingdom and the United States are more about finding your place in a social hierarchy than they are about education. There are nerds. There are jocks. There are cool kids. There are people like me. If you don’t learn how to bully the weak, you won’t succeed under capitalism. As Lindsey Anderson pointed out in his classic film “If..” there’s only one solution to high school bullying, revolution. Made before school shootings become common in the United States, “If…” ends with the bullied lower-form boys at an English “public school” on the roof, with machine guns, picking off the faculty, the alumni, and all the upper-form boys who bullied them. Teenage girls express aggression in a different and perhaps more damaging way from teenage boys. Girls won’t come right out and say “you dumb Pollack” or “you slut.” They’re more likely to give you the silent treatment, to “ice you out,” as my ex-girlfriend used to say, referring to the kind of social discipline she was subjected to in he upper-middle-class high school, to refuse to let you join their cliques. If Dagmara Przybysz had been a boy, she would have shot up the cafeteria. Instead, she committed suicide, and tarred her school forever as a cesspool of racism and bigotry.

Calling someone a “dumb Pollack” is basically an ethnicized version of calling him “white trash.” If Anglo Saxons are divided into WASPs, bourgeois people who can trace their ancestry to the British Isles, and “white trash,” working-class people who can trace their ancestry to the British Isles, then all Americans of Polish descent are “white trash,” working class. There’s no need for the modifier. For black Americans the only division that counts is the division between black and white. All white people, WASPs, dumb Pollacks, white trash southern crackers clinging to their guns and their religion, Jewish bankers, Italian mobsters, Greek diner owners, and Irish cops all have “white privilege.” The writer Ta-Nehisi Coates may be able to afford to invest $2,000,000 in a tax shelter in Brooklyn, and none of my ancestors were involved in the slave trade, but he still thinks I owe him “reparations.” To be more specific, I personally don’t owe him reparations, but as a white American, I have the same ethnic and racial advantages as Chelsea Clinton or one of the Rockefellers. “If we broke up the big banks tomorrow,” Hillary Clinton asks, the implied answer being no, “would that end racism? Would that end sexism?” That speech got her the black vote. Bernie Sanders, in turn, lost the black vote when he failed to respond quickly enough to the idea that class in the United States is mediated through race. Donald Trump, like Hillary Clinton, has spoken of the class struggle in terms of nationality and religion. If Hillary Clinton promises to protect blacks and Latinos from angry, working-class white men, then Donald Trump promises to protect the American working class from Muslims and from Mexican immigrants. Surprisingly, Trump has won, not only the nomination of the Republican Party, but also the grudging praise of black leftists like Glenn Ford.

I personally can’t vote for an American version of Nigel Farage or Marine Le Pen. Somewhere, in Arizona, there’s a Mexican version of Dagmara Przybysz who feels the growing American bigotry against Latinos as keenly as Dagmara Przybysz felt the growing English bigotry against Poles. I could also support Ta-Nehisi Coates on the idea of reparations, if and only if those reparations were a part of a larger struggle socialist revolution that would liberate the entire working class, but that won’t happen. Coates came out and said he’d vote for Bernie Sanders, but he was being disingenuous. He emerged during the Winter just before the Democratic primaries in the south, knifed Sanders in the back, then disappeared back into his apartment in Paris. Next January, the President of the United States will be Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump. Someday we may overcome but it won’t be today. Our next President will inevitably be one of two people who race baited their way to the White House. Let’s hope we make the best of it, but who am I kidding, we won’t. Teach your kids how to punch people in the mouth. It’s a skill that’s going to come in handy.

Advertisements

11 comments

  1. cortesdiddy · · Reply

    Incredible article. I’m going to namedrop Bieganski by Danuta Goska here, because that book expands on the subjects in your article.

    Props!

  2. cortesdiddy · · Reply

    However, I disagree with you both on your treatment of “racism” and on “white privilege”

    Anti Polish sentiment IS racist if we accept the common consensus definition. Race is not exclusive to skin color.

    On white privilege, I believe it is a very real thing, but tying into your criticism of Coates et al, I believe such privilege is NOT monolithic, certainly concerning class and identity.

    1. The definition of racism also varies from country to country.

  3. cortesdiddy · · Reply

    Also, re: Clinton ‘winning the black vote’ she did as an aggregate, but the bulk of that vote was older, Southern and otherwise, black voters.

    Bernie has won plenty of pluralities, if not slight majorities, of the younger/Millenial black vote in plenty of states. And continues to poll well with them and other young POC better than any other candidate, as per Gallup.

    1. I suppose I could expand a bit more on what’s going on as left/liberal parties turn neoliberal. The British Labor Party moved to the right exactly as large number of Polish immigrants were undercutting British wages. So *some* people in the UK turned to xenophobic parties like UKIP and a somewhat larger number adopted xenphobic attitudes.

      What’s going on in the US is even more complex. The Democrats have turned to the right under Clinton precisely as the “working class” is being given a choice between a Xenophobic right wing populist in Trump and a traditional liberal/social Democrat in Sanders. Because of the way the Democratic primaries are laid out, the neoliberal, right wing Democrat won the majority of the (probably most socialist) bloc of voters in the United States, largely though a combination of identity politics and appeals to a fear of right wing populism.

      Essentially Clinton has been able to cast Sanders (who’s closest to Corbyn) as a “white man’s candidate.” I suppose the British people also pretty decisively rejected xenophobia by electing a Muslim mayor of London. I’m not quite sure about his precise politics.

      I’m not exactly sure why the right-wing British press (and the far right wing Yahoo) is playing up a story about a suicide with only a tenuous connection to ethnic bigotry. My guess is that they might want to conflate racism with ethnic bigotry, something I don’t think I addressed with enough subtlety. I wonder if the right wing British press would even be covering this story had it not been for Sadiq Khan’s victory. It seems like they’re trying to say something like “hey we’re against racism, but look, white people are victims too.”

  4. […] via On Ethnic Slurs and White Privilege — Writers Without Money […]

  5. Richard · · Reply

    I am a Polish American and I am sick and tired of this nonsense by the Leftist media that all White people have “White Privilege”. It’s a LIE!! We Polish Americans have NO PRIVILEGE when comes to being harassed with ethnic slurs…unlike Blacks, Jews, Hispanics, Muslims who the media LOVES!! You are correct that still today in parts of America there are those who feel its OK to tell a degrading “Polish joke” that insults Polish people. Why should we Polish Americans be insulted like this when these same people telling anti-Polish “Polish jokes” wouldn’t dare insult Black people, Jewish people, HIspanic people, Muslims, (ethnic groups who have the privilege of constantly being promoted and defended in the Leftist media)? What hypocrisy!

    So when it comes to “who its OK to bash with ethnic slurs”….We Polish Americans have ABSOLUTELY NO PRIVILEGE….and its all of the Non-White Christian ethnic groups (who the Leftist media LOVES) that have all the privilege…because the Leftist media has conditioned Americans to be sensitive about insulting them….while this same media has PUSHED Anti-Polish “Polish jokes” to the American public to make the public have NO SENSITIVITY towards Polish people and even encouraged gullible Americans to bash Polish people with ethnic slurs.

    For God’s sake…these Anti-Polish jokes ORIGINATED from Nazi German propaganda because the Nazi Germans saw Polish people as having “subhuman intelligence”. Ironically and hypocritically….the Anti-Polish TV Networks NBC-TV, CBS-TV, ABC-TV and Hollywood imported these hateful Nazi “Polish jokes” into America after WWII, even though these TV networks claimed to be “Anti-Nazi”. Evidently, these Anti-Polish TV networks/Hollywood are against Nazi Propaganda…UNLESS it’s against POLISH PEOPLE!

    See

    Polish Jokes Origin is Nazi German Propaganda

    1. re: “For God’s sake…these Anti-Polish jokes ORIGINATED from Nazi German propaganda”

      Yes. And some were originally British anti-Irish jokes.

      But that book is poorly researched and smears a lot of good people like King Vidor.

  6. Richard · · Reply

    srogouski, You are correct. In Britain up until fairly recently….and in the US (prior to 1920)….all of the stupidity jokes were about the Irish people. From like 1800 to 1920 in the US….during the days of “Irish and Dogs need not apply” anti-Irish sentiment….all of the degrading jokes in America were about the Irish people being “dumb”. Irish were portrayed far worse than being “drunks”. They were portrayed as having “inferior intelligence” the way Polish people were portrayed in the 1960’s and on wards by Hollywood/NBC-TV, CBS-TV & ABC-TV with the “Polish jokes”.

    Polish American Review com discusses that somewhat here

    “Up until the 1960’s the jokes about Polish people were basically about Poles being stubborn, having thick accents. having hard to pronounce last names and eating too many kielbasas and pierogis. There wasn’t an emphasis on Polish people having inferior intelligence.

    Other ethnic groups in the early 1900’s were degraded with jokes about having inferior intelligence far worse then Polish people. The Irish were targeted with anti-Irish jokes constantly about how they only “had the minds of dogs” and “Irish and dogs need not apply” and “Irish think and look like white monkeys”. Italians were targeted with anti-Italian jokes about how they “only had the intelligence to do crude low class work” and “were greaseballs with grease in their brains”. Although there was some Hollywood/TV media afterwards that portrayed Irish and Italians along these lines, these OPINION MAKERS in Hollywood and the TV media didn’t have a prejudice against Irish and Italians the way they had against Polish people.”
    http://www.polishamericanreview.com/par2_002.htm

    The common Irish joke pertaining to “Irish and dogs need not apply” back in the old days in the US…was meant to degrade Irish people as if they were so :”dumb” that they were not smart enough to do or hold a job and that Irish intelligence was “no better than a dog’s intelligence”.

    Back in those days…during Anti-Irish sentiment….newspapers were filled with Irish jokes of cartoons of Irish people looking like white monkeys and other caricatures of Irish people having “subhuman intelligence”.

  7. I was raised in the USA .I am a legal American citizen since childhood. However, I was not born here nor were my parents ( also legal American citizens). At home, my parents never made fun of Polish people. In fact, my mother had a photo of the Polish Pope in her family album!!!! Personally, I always liked the Polish people I knew/ know. My personal perception of Polish people: hard working, kind, very respectful of Christianity, good sense of humor, noble hearts, deeply empathetic to others’ sufferings, innocent at times like children ( clean hearts) & very generous.

    Ps…I am Hispanic & not one ounce of Polish blood. Nor is anyone married to any native of Poland.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: