The End of Zionist Propaganda in America

s.720

When it comes to the conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians, I usually divide people into three categories. Supporters of Israel are my political opponents. Supporters of the Palestinians are my political allies. Yet — and for the moment let’s put aside progressives except for Palestine like Alan Grayson and Elizabeth Warren — I also have a third category, antisemites, people who support the Palestinians for all the wrong reasons. You can usually pick them out of a crowd by asking a simple question. “Do you believe that Israel controls the United States government?”

Alas, I feel that I may have to revise my litmus test. The recently introduced S.720, the Israel Anti-Boycott Act, sponsored by Ben Cardin of Maryland and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, a progressive except for Palestine if there ever was one, would make it a felony for “U.S. persons engaged in interstate or foreign commerce” to support the BDS, Boycott, Divestiture, Sanctions, movement. Say what you want about Ronald Reagan, for all his nonsense about “constructive engagement” with South Africa, he never tried to out and out criminalize the anti-Apartheid movement in America.

The usual, neoconservative suspects were quick to weigh in. The Daily Beast, for example, denies that S.720, criminalizes the BDS movement. The bill is vaguely worded and has a lot of room for plausible deniability, and seems to target the The United Nations Human Rights Council more than individual Americans. Also, let’s face it. The typical American couldn’t care less about what happens to the Palestinians. We all know who Cardin and Gillibrand, under the tutelage of AIPAC, are really going after, Arab immigrant and Muslim organizations.

Nevertheless, I can’t help but suspect that this ham handed bill is really about the ever diminishing effectiveness of Zionist propaganda in America. Just because most Americans couldn’t care less about the Palestinians doesn’t mean they care anymore about the Israelis. Baby Boomers did. I never cease to wonder how brilliant, spiritually liberating artists like Bob Dylan or Leonard Cohen fail to wrap their brains around the inescapable reality that Israel is a white supremacist state with a intricate, yet harsh system of ethnic and religious apartheid. I suppose it’s generational. For Baby Boomers, the memory of the Holocaust has always been fresh in their minds. Anything, even support for an oppressed people like the Palestinians, that smacks of being anti-Jewish, is suspect. Millennials are different. Young people simply don’t buy the idea that Israel represents the Jewish people against the ever present danger of antisemitism. They don’t accept the argument that because Hitler locked Polish Jews behind a wall that also gives the Israelis the right to lock the Palestinians behind their own wall. The Israel Lobby’s recent attack against the Chicago Dyke March, for example, largely fell flat. The ongoing campaign against Linda Sarsour seems to be going nowhere.

In other words, when persuasion no longer works, the state always turns to brute force. Make no mistake, as soon as Americans no longer believe in capitalism, in upward mobility, and in the meritocracy, they will see storm troopers at their doors and tanks in the streets. I can’t help but think that S.720 represents the end of Zionist propaganda and the beginning of Zionist repression, right here in the United States.

Advertisements

6 comments

  1. Stan,

    Thank you, thank you, thank you. I just heard about this bill this morning, and I hope enough people see the danger before Congress is stupid enough to pass it. It supposedly has a whole bunch of supporters in Congress, including Ted Cruz.

    What must these people be thinking? Maybe they are brain-dead, as I’ve suspected for years. Is this Congress’ compulsion to “Do something, even it it’s wrong?”

    1. I read a couple of articles where provocative requests for comment that were responded to by the supporters’ offices almost all stated that they didn’t really know what was in the bill, they’ll look further into it, blah blah blah. These idiots are terrible. Do they really think it better for U.S. senators to appear to have supported an anti-first amendment bill out of ignorance rather than malice?

      1. Pretty much the standard answer.

      2. Aloysius Vi, As I suggested: Brain dead.

  2. What is crazy about this it that it is only adapting existing US law. Apparently it is already illegal for US companies to join international boycotts against Israel. This law does nothing except to expand some of the definitions of the previous law to include shade towards BDS and the UN. I am not sure how the ACLU decided it targets individuals. What is crazy is that a company is not required to do business with Israel, many already do not. A company could even stop doing business with Israel and as long as its not because of a boycott, its still fine. So why, if corporations are now people, are they not granted their first amendment rights. I started thinking this was a weird way in which citizens united could be used to grant corporations the right to participate in boycotts, which I reiterate, is and was illegal before this bill. They do not care if we do not buy soda stream, what they fear the most is that a big company, under pressure, could stop all business with them.

    1. to include shade towards BDS and the UN

      Which is designed to intimidate Muslim and Arab immigrant organizations behind BDS.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: